The Coding Aperitivo is our take on a weekly seminar series. We end the working week and wind down with some relaxed academic chatter, a drink and some snacks.
When in Milan, drink as the Milanese. Though the official recipe calls for equal parts gin, Campari and red vermouth, here we opt for a punchier negroni, heavy on the gin. For a sbagliato, substitute the gin for prosecco.
- 3-4 parts gin (to taste)
- 2 parts campari
- 1 part red vermouth.
Pour the ingredients into a mixing glass with ice and stir until the glass feels very cold. Strain into a glass with a (very) large ice cube and a twist of orange (and rub the glass rim with it).
The sessions are hybrid (online/in-person), with the guest generally being remote. As well as our guest, we also have an internal whiteboard-only talk about current work or a topic that has been tugging at our heartstrings.
We encourage our guests to try different formats with us such as guided discussions, hands-on activities, PechaKucha, debates or just a nice academic chat. Got some research ideas you and you want a sounding board? We are very happy to to discuss ongoing or upcoming research.
In previous sessions, some guests have:
- Used the Jigsaw method in order to introduce a topic in a hands-on manner.
- Introduced a premise for debate, then separated the audience into two teams to discuss among ourselves, finally bringing the teams together in order argue their points.
- Used one existing work as a basis for questioning our assumptions about the research process
- Briefly presented ongoing work, highlighting challenges or potential research avenues to discuss.
- Given us a hands-on activity (e.g. data annotation) meant to highlight the challenges of a particular task.
- Emily Sheng (University of Southern California) on Biases in NLG and Dialogue Systems
- Nedjma Ousidhoum (University of Cambridge) on Expectations vs. Reality when Working on Toxic Content Detection in NLP
- Nils Reimers on Training State-of-the-Art Text Embedding & Neural Search Models
- Maarten Sap (Allen AI/CMU) on Detecting and Rewriting Socially Biased Language
- Sunipa Dev (Google Research) on “Towards Interpretable, Fair and Socially-Aware of Language Representations”
- Alba Curry (UC Riverside) on Philosophy of Emotion and Sentiment Detection
- Rob van der Goot (IT University of Copenhagen) on Multi-lingual and Multi-task learning: from Dataset Creation to Modeling
- Su Lin Blodgett (Microsoft FATE) on Social and Ethical Implications of NLP Technologies
- Gabriele Sarti (University of Groningen) on Interpreting Neural Language Models for Linguistic Complexity Assessment
- Paul Röttger (University of Oxford) on Two Contrasting Data Annotation Paradigms for Subjective NLP Tasks
- Chia-Chien Hung (University of Mannheim) on Multi-domain and Multilingual Dialog
- Anna Wegmann (Utrecht University) on Does It Capture STEL? A Modular, Similarity-based Linguistic Style Evaluation Framework
- Abhilasha Ravichander (Carnegie Mellon University) on Probing the Probing Paradigm: Does Probing Accuracy Entail Task Relevance?
- Samson Tan (AWS AI Research & Education) on Towards Sociolinguistically-Inclusive NLP: An Adversarial Approach
- Christine de Kock on I Beg to Differ: A study of constructive disagreement in online conversations
- Eliana Pastor (Politecnico di Torino) on Pattern-based algorithms for Explainable AI
- Dave Howcroft (Napier University) on Low-Resource NLG
- Zeerak Talat (Digital Democracies Institute) led a discussion on Ethics, bias
- Christopher Klamm (University of Mannheim) on Defining and Measuring Polasiration Across Disciplines
- Swabha Swayamdipta (Allen Institute for AI) on Annotation Challenges in NLP
- Carlo Schwarz (Università Bocconi) on How Polarized are Citizens? Measuring Ideology from the Ground-Up
- Mark Dingemanse and Andreas Liesenfeld on Language Diversity in Conversational AI Research
- Agostina Calabrese (University of Edinburgh) on If Data Patterns is the Answer, What was the Question?